ap material facts

ap material factsap material factsap material facts
Home
Cause
Legal Action
Ministrial Acts
Liability
Attorney Ethics
Conflict of Interest
Historic Roots
Youth Programs
Acknowledgements
Civil Conspiracy

ap material facts

ap material factsap material factsap material facts
Home
Cause
Legal Action
Ministrial Acts
Liability
Attorney Ethics
Conflict of Interest
Historic Roots
Youth Programs
Acknowledgements
Civil Conspiracy
More
  • Home
  • Cause
  • Legal Action
  • Ministrial Acts
  • Liability
  • Attorney Ethics
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Historic Roots
  • Youth Programs
  • Acknowledgements
  • Civil Conspiracy
  • Sign In
  • Create Account

  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • filler@godaddy.com


  • My Account
  • Sign out


Signed in as:

filler@godaddy.com

  • Home
  • Cause
  • Legal Action
  • Ministrial Acts
  • Liability
  • Attorney Ethics
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Historic Roots
  • Youth Programs
  • Acknowledgements
  • Civil Conspiracy

Account

  • My Account
  • Sign out

  • Sign In
  • My Account

 

LCN Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Asbury Park, 197 F. Supp. 2d 141 (D.N.J. 2002)

material facts

If the City responded to the damages and returned the Promoters money. It's more likely than not that the LCN Promoters were issued at the very least the money they spent out to produce the event.


The Promoter in this situation was forced into a hardship, while the City and Civilian Police Director had an active Court Ruling and Order against them that prohibited Mr Jordan from exercising police powers he used to force the shutdown. 


Mr Jordans prohibited actions destroyed the Promoter's company and credibility as majority of the City's Employees who had knowledge and influence, sided with the Mr Jordan, Mayor Sanders, the City Council and City Manager's Office, which also trickled over to some community influencers.

Look up who was the Mayor and City Council in February 2002 and look up who was the Mayor and City Council in September 2004...


Who were the Attorney's for the City is another interesting question 🤔 The law firm is the same Ansell, Zaro, Grimm and Aaron.  Attorney's Rafetto and Capp were assigned to this situation in questioning. They are not exempt from complying with the rules of ethics.

Copyright © 2025 AP Materia Facts - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by FACTS

  • Legal Action
  • Ministrial Acts
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Public Records
  • Historic Roots
  • Defamation

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept