Former Officials for Asbury Park NJ fraudulently destroyed an Entrepreneur.
It was easier to deceive the Plaintiff than to face the consequences from the State & Judicial System. Palpably Unreasonable
It was easier to deceive the Plaintiff than to face the consequences from the State & Judicial System. Palpably Unreasonable
JUDICIAL MANDATES AND MINISTERIAL ORDERS are LEGALLY BINDING and MUST be STRICTLY FOLLOWED by Public Officials to whom they are directed and must not be CONCEALED.
In a PRECEDENTIAL DECISION, the Superior Court, Appellate Division, in Catena v. Raytheon Company, et al.,(August 18, 2016), held that the Discovery Rule applied to common law fraud claims (Fraudulent Concealment) as well as fraud claims under New Jersey's Consumer Fraud Act (CFA) and was held 17 years later.
FRADULENT CONCEAMENT
Download PDFAll surprise(s), trick(s), cunning(s), dissembling and other unfair ways that is used to cheat anyone is considered as fraud. Kerr, Fraud and Mistake, 1 (7th ed. (1952)). See also 37 Am. Jur.2d, Fraud and Deceit § 1, pp. 17-20 (1968); Riverside Trust Co. v. Collin, 114 N.J. Eq. 157 (E. & A. 1933).
In New Jersey, municipalities are not immune from claims of fraudulent concealment. While public entities enjoy broad immunity from liability under the New Jersey Tort Claims Act (Title 59), this protection does not extend to intentionally fraudulent conduct.
A party may not benefit from its own fraudulent conduct. Joe D'Egidio Landscaping, Inc. v. Apicella, 337 N.J. Super. 252, 257 (App. Div. 2001).
Copyright © 2025 AP Materia Facts - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by FACTS
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.