Officials for Asbury Park NJ fraudulently destroyed an Entrepreneur.
The Fiduciaries committed EXTRINSIC Fraud & Civil Rights Violations. These are continuous violations, revived on Aug 2, 2026.
the municipal scheme and motive" has been unmasked!
-e0017f9.png/:/cr=t:4.21%25,l:0%25,w:100%25,h:91.58%25)
About
This is a cause of action for breach of fiduciary duties under special relationships and duties of candor as per the rules of Attorney Ethics.
The Following FACTS cannot be altered, changed or defended!
NO PUBLIC RECORD: The absolute, historic fact that neither the Monmouth County Prosecutor's Office, the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office nor the Hon Judge Linda Feinberg of the Superior Court initiated further civil or criminal contempt sanctions against the City of Asbury Park from 2004–2026, "is definitive proof of FRAUD", as the unmasking of what's happening now, would have definitely happened back then. There was no media coverage of the criminal contempt, no one was removed from their position, no one was barred from holding future public office nor were any benefits and or pensions removed that public records would reflect.
UNDISPUTED FACTS: Mr Jordan would have been barred from having the position as Security Director for the school system, had he and the other Fiduciaries, not breached their sworn duties to uphold the law. There would be Court Records of contempt of court and criminal records if these fiduciary duties and duties of candor were not breached. Jordan v the Asbury Park BOE is valid proof of FRAUD in multiple was as confirmed on Court Record and violations of State Attorney Ethics by the previous and current Attorney's for the City of Asbury Park Enterprise.
SMOKING GUN FACTS: The unmasked evidence that "was concealed" has been accepted and held by an Agency overseen by the NJ State Attorney General's Office. Long out of reach of the City Fiduciaries and their Duty of Candor Defense Attorney(s).
It was easier to deceive the local entrepreneur than it was to face the consequences for violating Judge Feinberg's Judicial Mandate and Superior Court Order!
All Surprise(s), Trick(s), Cunning(s), Dissembling and other unfair ways that is used to cheat anyone is considered as fraud. Kerr, Fraud and Mistake, 1 (7th ed. (1952)). See also 37 Am. Jur.2d, Fraud and Deceit § 1, pp. 17-20 (1968); Riverside Trust Co. v. Collin, 114 N.J. Eq. 157 (E. & A. 1933).
The Supreme Court of New Jersey formally established fraudulent concealment as an independent tort for evidence spoliation in Rosenblit v. Zimmerman, 166 N.J. 20, 766 A.2d 749 (2001)
ATTN: City Attorney Mr Kevin Starkey. In good faith, we invite you to have retired Justice Solomon review our contracts between us, the Paramount Theatre and the City of Asbury Park NJ while including the Judicial Mandates put in place by the Hon Judge Linda Feinberg. If your client (The City of Asbury Park NJ) is in the right "legally", there should be zero issues with this good faith request as you and your client did the same upon the Redevelopment company for agreements dating back to 2002. These issues should be transparent as they involve violations of Public Policy, the Public's Trust and Contempt of Court regarding a Superior Court Judicial Mandate and Court Order! As an Attorney you are competently aware that "March and July are BEFORE September of the same year"...
Mr Starkey, certified evidence shows the enterprise you are defending and covering for "willfully knew" and had a duty to uphold the law and comply with the Judicial Orders. Discrimination is not Contempt. If you are aware of the Court Rules, you clearly are aware of these facts, you have been made aware of, as an Officer of the Court sir.
the title 59 "immunity scheme" has been unmasked!
as of august 2, 2026 the fraud has continued on court record
BUSINESS DESTROYED FROM fraudulent title 59 impossibility
Evidence shows the City of Asbury Park NJ Weaponized the Court System to commit fraudulent acts that are logged on the Court's Registry to Evade Judicial Accountability!
continuous violations restart the statute of limitations!
business destroyed by former officials of the Executive and Legal Branches. proof shows the plaintiff's LEVEL OF biz. not DIDDY'S ALLEGATIONS.
Material facts were concealed to avoid consequences
In the case Platinum Links Ent v Atlantic City Surf Pro Baseball Club 2002. 3rd Circuit United States District Court Judge the Hon Joseph E. Irenas noted that the City's attempt to block the show was based on a "dislike of the message" and an unfair stereotype of rap fans. The ruling emphasized that Officials could not single out rap music for cancellation while allowing other genres.
NJLAD; Using "public safety" as a justification to cancel or restrict a specific genre of music (like rap) after the police and venue has already approved security measures for the event is discriminatory. It is a pretext for bias against the artists, promoter(s) and the audience.
springsteen and community roots
"the city had direct knowledge of this superior court order"
"IN THE ABSENCE OF TRUTH, LIES PREVAIL"
Copyright © 2025 - 2026 AP Material Facts - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by FACTS
This website uses cookies.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.