if these facts are false seek relief for defamation, slander & libel

Fraudulent Concealment of a Court's Ruling and Order that was violated, vacates immunity for any NJ municipality who deliberately disregarded the Court's decision. Fraudulent Concealment is a separate cause of action as per the NJ Supreme Court.

New Jersey Municipalities are not above the law, as seen in a 2025 Supreme Court case that held a Municipality liable for engaging in "bad faith" and "frivolous litigation".

Under the NJ Discovery Rule and Turning Square Corners Doctrine. In July 2004 there was an active Court Ruling and Order against the City of Asbury Park NJ and Civilian Police Director Louis Jordan. Mr Jordan as a Civilian without police powers and who was prohibited from exercising police powers met with the Plaintiff on September 17, 2004 (After the July Court Order) after receiving a memorandum from Sworn Officer of Rank Mr Gilbert Reed on September 13, 2004. (evidence will be provided)

In July 2004, which is before September 2004. Mercer County Superior Court specifically prohibited Mr Jordan from exercising police powers by way of a Court Ordered. Mr Jordan disregarded the Court's Order as he confirmed in his own police memorandum he provided during an insurance claim investigation. 

The City of Asbury Park negligently failed to supervise Mr Jordan and are liable for Ordinances 2616 and 2667 under the Monell Doctrine for creating and later failing to amend or repeal these policies to reflect the Court's Ruling and Order. There was no change until 2007 as records confirm.

In a PRECEDENTIAL DECISION, the Superior Court, Appellate Division, in Catena v. Raytheon Company, et al.,(August 18, 2016), held that the Discovery Rule applied to Common Law Fraud Claims as well as fraud claims under New Jersey's Consumer Fraud Act (CFA) and was held 17 years later.